A coalition of political parties in Ghana has expressed strong dissatisfaction with the decision of the Jean Mensah-led Electoral Commission (EC) to conduct the 2023 limited voter registration at the 268 District Offices of the EC. Comprising the Convention People’s Party (CPP), People’s National Convention (PNC), All People’s Congress (APC), Great Consolidated Popular Party (GCPP), Liberal Party of Ghana (LPG), National Democratic Party (NDP), and Ghana Freedom Party (GFP), this coalition is united in their demand for EC to revert to the 2019 arrangement.
The EC’s decision to shift the limited voter registration process to its district offices has sparked a collective response from the coalition of political parties. Citing concerns over accessibility, convenience, and transparency, the parties have raised their voices against the decision. They argue that the move to 268 District Offices could potentially limit citizens’ participation in the registration exercise, particularly those residing in more remote areas.
The heart of the coalition’s opposition lies in their demand for the limited voter registration exercise to return to the 1500 electoral areas that were gazetted and used during the 2019 limited registration exercise. These electoral areas are seen as more accessible and representative of the population, allowing a broader cross-section of citizens to participate in the democratic process. The political parties contend that this change in venue would promote inclusivity and uphold the principles of free and fair elections.
Accessibility to the voter registration process is a critical aspect of a functioning democracy. The coalition of political parties argues that by conducting the limited registration in the electoral areas, citizens, particularly those in rural or underserved areas, would be more likely to engage in the process. This approach aligns with the broader goals of ensuring that every eligible citizen has the opportunity to exercise their democratic rights without undue hurdles.
Transparency in the electoral process is fundamental to building trust among citizens. The political parties’ opposition to the EC’s decision is also rooted in concerns about transparency. They contend that conducting the limited voter registration at district offices might raise doubts about the fairness of the process, potentially leading to suspicions of bias or manipulation. On the other hand, using established electoral areas could enhance transparency by allowing party agents and observers to monitor the process more effectively.
As the political parties rally against the EC’s decision, their united front signifies the importance of an inclusive and transparent electoral process. Their demand for a change in venue to the established electoral areas emphasizes the significance of accessibility, representation, and fairness in voter registration. It remains to be seen whether the EC will reconsider its decision in light of these concerns or if the opposition will lead to further dialogue and collaboration between the electoral body and the political parties.
