A Ghanaian petitioner has criticised the awarding of top government officials, describing the honours as unjustified and disconnected from performance on key national issues.

Kamaldeen Ibrahim said several ministers recognised at a recent ceremony had not delivered on critical mandates, citing worsening illegal mining (galamsey) and inter-ministerial funding disputes.

“How do you award a minister for solving galamsey when the situation has worsened?” he questioned on the Asaase Breakfast Show on Tuesday (9 June).

He also raised concerns about tensions between ministries, particularly over budget allocations, suggesting these challenges contradict claims of effective governance.

“Ministers themselves are complaining that funds are being withheld. Yet we are celebrating performance—based on what metrics?” Ibrahim asked.

The petitioner argued that public recognition should reflect measurable outcomes rather than perceived achievements.

He further noted that criticism of the awards cuts across political lines, with supporters of both major parties expressing discomfort.

“This is not a partisan issue. Many Ghanaians, regardless of affiliation, are embarrassed by what has happened,” he said.

Ibrahim urged authorities to uphold transparency and ensure that public honours reflect genuine service delivery.